In this blog, senior staffer Amy Rice argues that the FDA should fully embrace a "method-neutral" approach by accepting New Approach Methodologies (“NAMs”) as primary evidence of drug efficacy. She contends that traditional animal testing is often an outdated and poor predictor of human outcomes, whereas modern tools like organ-on-chip models offer superior scientific precision. Ultimately, Rice asserts that regulators must move beyond historical biases to implement the FDA Modernization Acts, thereby accelerating innovation and reducing the costs of biomedical and agricultural development.
In this blog, 2L staffer Samuel Lay examines a new method to apply 5th Amendment Takings Claims in response to changing regulations regarding Solar Farms built on farmland in Lexington, Ky. Lay breaks down the changing landscape regarding the city’s solar regulations. This is followed by a proposed new method in determining what constitutes total economic deprivation for a per se takings. The proposed change would alter the current meaning of total deprivation to depriving the owner of the value they have in the land. Lay argues that this new method is fairer to those who want to build solar farms in Lexington but may be discouraged due to the ever-changing landscape of solar regulation in Lexington.
In this blog, 2L staffer Emma Johns explores the expansion of solar energy projects on reclaimed coal lands in Eastern Kentucky. She argues that although these developments offer potential economic and environmental benefits, current legal and regulatory systems fail to adequately protect landowners and local communities. She concludes that stronger regulations and greater community protections are necessary to ensure a fair and effective transition to renewable energy.
In this blog, 2L staffer Sophia Sears analyzes the Prevent All Soring Tactics (PAST) Act, recently introduced to the 119th Congress, which proposes regulations that strengthen the Horse Protection Act (HPA) by broadening the definition of soring, increasing penalties for violations, and replacing the current self-regulatory structure with USDA-administered oversight. Sears argues that such reforms are necessary to address potential conflicts of interest in the current structure and better prevent equine abuse. Ultimately, Sears contends that federal regulations that deliberately combat abuse against horses are essential for preserving the equestrian industry's social license to operate-- such regulations ensure public acceptance of horse-participation in competitive sport.
Chronic Wasting Disease has spread to Kentucky's wild deer population despite decades of regulatory effort, and the state's current framework of surveillance zones, carcass transport restrictions, and captive cervid compliance requirements imposes significant burdens on hunters and farmers while producing diminishing returns against a prion that persists in the environment for years regardless of county lines. In this blog, 2L staffer Chase Turner argues that Kentucky should complement its existing regulatory tools with a structured pilot program allowing state agencies and licensed cervid farms to collaborate on selectively breeding deer carrying less susceptible PRNPgenetic variants, drawing on peer-reviewed research demonstrating that targeted selection can dramatically reduce the frequency of highly susceptible genotypes within a herd. Rather than abandoning containment strategies, Turner calls on Kentucky policymakers to follow the emerging science and make the herd itself part of the solution by shifting some of the focus from restricting what hunters and farmers can do toward building biological resilience into the deer population
In this blog, 2L staffer Kimberly Thomas examines how environmental law is a means to combat the construction of new immigration detention centers that risk local ecosystems and waterways. Kimberly argues that circuit courts must characterize the construction of immigration detention centers as a "major federal action" under NEPA for the safety of our environment.
In this blog, 2L Staffer Christina Grimes examines the growing crisis of textile waste in the United States’ landfills as a result of the fast fashion industry. She highlights the serious environmental consequences of this waste, particularly from synthetic fibers commonly used in fast fashion, which can cause significant harm to the surrounding air, soil, and water. Grimes argues that Kentucky should take steps to mitigate this waste by implementing an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) program, similar to California’s program, which shifts the responsibility from municipalities to fashion producers for textile end-of-life accountability.
In this blog, 2L staffer Mira Talwalkar looks at the newly proposed Kentucky Senate Bill 178, which would prohibit any state environmental regulations from being more stringent than federal ones. Talwalkar argues that this bill ignores Congress’s intentions to give states freedom in determining how they implement local environmental regulations, and is especially concerning in Kentucky, where environmental toxins are present at a higher level than those nationally.
In this blog, 2L staffer Lakyn LeMaster argues that Kentucky should adopt stronger safety precautions for private well users. She explains how current regulations leave users unnecessarily exposed to serious health risks posed by common contaminants. LeMaster recommends that Kentucky follow the lead of other states by implementing affordable water testing programs and requiring routine monitoring.
In this blog, 3L senior staffer Shelby Davidson analyzes the economic boom and rise of generative AI companies which have led states to scramble for the opportunity to capitalize on the growth, creating tax incentives to encourage the construction of new data centers. Davidson highlights the environmental threats posed by data centers, including excessive electricity and water usage, which has led to different approaches to regulation. Davidson argues Kentucky should follow Virginia’s system, with a strict regulatory framework, rather than West Virginia, which has given data centers almost entirely free rein, to the detriment of its citizens.
In this blog, 3L senior staffer Reed Burrow examines how Taiwan’s dominance in chip manufacturing has placed the island at the center of a potentially major geopolitical conflict. Burrow argues that Taiwan’s “silicon shield” remains a powerful deterrent to Chinese invasion, but warns that its strength ultimately depends on the water and energy resources needed to sustain chip production.
Kentucky's 67,700 farms represent an untapped opportunity in the voluntary carbon credit market, but transaction costs have kept small farmers on the sidelines of a rapidly developing global credit supply. In this blog, 2L staffer Spencer Harris argues that the Kentucky Agricultural Development Board already holds the mandate and the money through the state's $2.8 billion share of the Tobacco Master Settlement. This money can be used to subsidize the verification costs that stand between tobacco-legacy farmers and a new, recurring income stream.
In this blog, 3L senior staffer Caidan Drenk examines the growing tension between Kentucky’s statutory recognition of agritourism and the continued use of local zoning authority to regulate farm-based events such as weddings and festivals. He argues that although Kentucky law expressly recognizes these activities as agritourism, local land-use regulations can still create significant uncertainty for farmers seeking to diversify their operations. Drenk contends that the Kentucky General Assembly should clarify the relationship between agritourism statutes and local zoning authority to better protect working farms and promote agricultural sustainability.
In this blog, 2L staffer Braden Porter argues that courts reviewing pesticide registrations under the EPA should consider staying judgments, rather than vacating during active growing seasons. Porter explains that while vacatur can correct agency actions, the timing of the decisions can harm farmers who rely on federal registrations to plan for the planting and growing seasons. He argues that courts should exercise their discretion to delay the effects of vacatur and preserve their authority, while preventing disruption to seasonal industries such as agriculture.
In this blog, 2L staffer Luke Glasscock discusses how a nearly century-old safety net for farmers, dating back to the first farm bill in 1933, has given way to a federal crop insurance program that disproportionately benefits large farming operations. Glasscock contends that if federal crop insurance discouraged risk-taking in agricultural practices and subsidy caps were placed on large farms, not only could this economy of scale be reduced, but also more attention could be given to high-risk small farms.
In this blog, 2L staffer Jack Klier illustrates how the practice of home distillation brings up constitutional questions of taxation, public safety issues, and potential federal overreach. While a recent United States District Court ruling has raised important questions about Congress’s enumerated powers, Klier argues that the ruling is likely not strong enough on its merits to convince the Supreme Court to depart from its decision in Wickard.
In this blog, 3L Staffer Luke Price discusses the growing use of prediction-market platforms that allow users to profit from horse-race outcomes while operating outside traditional pari-mutuel wagering systems. Price argues that these event-contract trades function as wagering under the Interstate Horseracing Act and should therefore be subject to racing-commission oversight and consent requirements. He contends that without clarification or enforcement, prediction markets could undermine the regulatory framework designed to protect racing integrity and equine welfare.
In this blog, 2L Staffer Georgia Arrington discusses how the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) has missed its mark by neglecting to include golf course workers as a covered group under its Worker Protection Standards (WPS). In excluding these workers and excluding golf courses that are not used for sod production from the WPS, Arrington argues FIFRA is failing to provide meaningful protection from the dangers of pesticides on golf courses. Arrington illustrates that if the increased rates of Parkinson’s disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in this cohort are not enough to demand regulatory reform, the EPA's continued approval of pesticides banned in other sectors but still used on golf courses certainly should be.
In this blog, 2L staffer Nicholas Marini explores the ramifications of a recent EPA ruling affirming the right to repair. For years, farm equipment manufacturers paid steep premiums to repair their equipment with the manufacturers, not because the quality was better, but because they were legally required to do so.
- April 2026 (10)
- March 2026 (11)
- February 2026 (5)
- November 2025 (10)
- October 2025 (10)
- September 2025 (1)
- August 2025 (2)
- April 2025 (3)
- March 2025 (6)
- February 2025 (6)
- January 2025 (1)
- December 2024 (1)
- November 2024 (2)
- September 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (5)
- April 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (9)
- September 2023 (3)
- August 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (4)
- April 2023 (12)
- March 2023 (5)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (5)
- October 2022 (6)
- September 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (8)
- February 2022 (7)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (1)
- October 2021 (16)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (12)
- February 2021 (11)
- January 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (9)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (6)
- September 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (9)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (2)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (7)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (4)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (6)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (5)
- January 2017 (4)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (6)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (5)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (8)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (5)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (10)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (7)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (2)
- April 2014 (7)
- March 2014 (7)
- February 2014 (8)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (8)
- October 2013 (10)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (4)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (8)
- March 2013 (10)
- February 2013 (9)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (9)
- September 2012 (10)
- August 2012 (5)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (9)
- February 2012 (8)
- January 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (8)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (11)
- March 2010 (17)
- February 2010 (21)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (22)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (8)

In this blog, 2L staffer Grace Hager analyzes the escalating legal crisis facing the "Clean Beauty" industry driven by 2026 FDA findings and new state-level bans. Hager explores the debate between the industry’s current reliance on self-defined clean standards versus the growing legal demand for lab-verified transparency. Ultimately, she takes the position that retailers must assume a heightened legal risk that can no longer be hidden by vague marketing claims.